TreasureCorp Financial Dashboard Partnership - Phase 2#

Author: Sarah Sawyer Date: August 20, 2025 Website: www.treasurecorp.io MoonDAO TreasureCorp Dashboard: https://www.treasurecorp.io/dao/tomoondao.eth/treasury

Abstract#

Based on successful project in Q2 2025 per MoonDAO gov cycle (see results here), we propose a comprehensive 4-quarter enhancement roadmap for TreasureCorp's MoonDAO integration. This proposal covers Q3 2025 with the two highest-priority features: Multi-Wallet & Cross-Chain Aggregation and Contributor Rewards System (Tableland Integration). This establishes the foundation for Q4 2025-Q2 2026 enhancements including Governance Dashboard improvements, Reporting Dashboard upgrades, and UX/Usability refinements. The Q3 deliverables provide complete treasury visibility across Ethereum and Arbitrum operations while integrating with MoonDAO's contributor management ecosystem.

Disclaimer: This is a non-binding proposal submitted for MoonDAO community review. All details, timelines, features, and terms outlined in this proposal may be amended based on feedback and input from the MoonDAO community during the review process.

Problem#

Our Phase 1 Final Report identified that TreasureCorp's existing platform provides 70-80% of MoonDAO's financial analytics needs, but two critical gaps were identified via community feedback:

1. Multi-Chain Treasury Fragmentation: MoonDAO operates treasuries across Ethereum ($870K) and Arbitrum ($300K+), requiring unified visibility across all Safe wallets for complete financial oversight and governance decision-making.
2. Contributor Rewards Integration: MoonDAO's sophisticated contributor management system using Coordinape for allocation inputs, Tableland for on-chain reward tracking, and Google Sheets for quarterly calculations requires seamless integration to provide comprehensive contributor analytics and historical reward transparency.

Solution#

Comprehensive 4-Quarter Enhancement Roadmap#

Based on community feedback and feature overview change requests, we propose a structured approach to platform development. This proposal focuses specifically on addressing the critical gaps identified by the MoonDAO community, while the comprehensive roadmap ensures systematic enhancement delivery across all requested features:

Q3 2025: Foundation Features (This Proposal)#

1. Multi-Wallet & Cross-Chain Aggregation

• Why it matters: MoonDAO has wallets across Ethereum and Arbitrum. Members want unified view grouped by wallet type (exec vs project etc.)
• What's included: Ethereum + Arbitrum support, Wallet grouping, Inflow/outflow breakdowns, Treasury overview, Future chain readiness
• Priority: Critical foundation for all other features

2. Contributor Rewards System (Tableland Integration)

• Why it matters: Goal is to see how much each person earned, where rewards are going, how evenly it's being distributed, and ties back to project contributions
• What's included: Cycle-based rewards explorer, Tableland ingestion, Sankey view, Contributor fairness, Multi-source import
• Priority: Matches DAO's retroactive reward culture

Additional Value-Add Service: MoonDAO Citizen Recruitment Integration

• What's included: Embedded signup form or direct link integration within TreasureCorp platform for non-MoonDAO users to become MoonDAO citizens
• Purpose: Drive revenue growth and community expansion by converting TreasureCorp users into MoonDAO participants
• Implementation: Seamless integration within dashboard interface with clear value proposition for citizenship benefits

MoonDAO Revenue Generation Support#

Direct Revenue Impact:

• Launchpad Analytics: Enhanced treasury visibility supports MoonDAO's goal to increase annual recurring revenue through launchpad operations and Space Acceleration Network growth
• Collective Funding Optimization: Multi-chain aggregation enables better treasury management to maximize current assets while maintaining 3-year operational runway
• Decentralized Revenue Tracking: Real-time monitoring of revenue streams including AMM fees, staking rewards, and subscription services

Note: Specific revenue generation methodologies and impact calculations will be discussed and defined during the requirements phase to ensure alignment with MoonDAO's preferred approaches.

Cost Recovery Analysis:

• Platform cost represents a minimal percentage of MoonDAO's operational budget
• Enables data-driven decisions to achieve revenue targets through transparent, borderless collaboration
• Supports democratized access to financial analytics traditionally available only to larger organizations

Role-Specific Benefits & Platform Support#

Governance Participants:

• Voters (Locked MOONEY Holders): Clear treasury visibility for informed proposal voting decisions
• Delegates (250K+ vMOONEY): Comprehensive data to support proposal submission and community advocacy

Active Contributors:

• Moon Settlers (Project Contributors): Self-service access to contribution tracking and reward transparency
• Rocketeers (Project Leaders): Access to contributor reward data and treasury flows to support team coordination and project decision-making
• Astronauts (Leadership): Executive dashboard with real-time operational metrics and strategic planning data across all DAO wallets and addresses

Treasury Management:

• Treasury Signers: Enhanced transaction monitoring and multi-sig coordination tools
• Community Members: Transparent access to DAO financial health and democratic participation in resource allocation

Alumni & Community:

• Voyagers (Former Contributors): Historical contribution recognition and ongoing community connection
• Verified Community Members: Clear pathways to increased participation through transparent reward systems

Executive Operations Support#

Daily Operations Enhancement:

• Real-time Dashboard: Support leadership daily coordination with live treasury and project data
• Communications Analytics: Track community engagement and partnership effectiveness
• Operations Automation: Streamline quarterly incentive tracking and multisig transaction monitoring
• Development Insights: Provide technical teams with platform usage analytics for continuous improvement

Performance Tracking Integration#

Quarterly Performance Metrics:

• Treasury Growth Measurement: Automated tracking capabilities for quarterly treasury performance*
• Revenue Attribution: Identify which initiatives contribute to organizational sustainability
• Multi-Token Analytics: Support rewards and revenue tracking across MOONEY, ETH, DAI, and other assets

*Note: Specific treasury growth calculation methods (QTG) will be discussed and defined during the requirements phase to ensure alignment with MoonDAO's preferred methodologies.

Q4 2025: Governance & Trust Building#

3. Governance Dashboard Enhancements

• Why it matters: DAO has low turnout and proposal authorship is concentrated. Lifecycle status is unclear. Governance trust needs data support
• What's included: Proposer distribution, Turnout %, Vote power Sankey, Proposal status clarity, Filters, Trends

Q1 2026: Professional Reporting#

4. Reporting Dashboard Improvements

• Why it matters: DAO contributors aren't analysts. They need budget-aligned rollups, project indexing, and exports
• What's included: Project-level earnings, Exports, Timeline dropdowns, Token movement, Exec/project budget mapping

Q2 2026: User Experience & Polish#

5. UI/UX Fixes & Clarifications

• Why it matters: Transparency and ease of understanding is hindered by unclear labels, tooltips, and logic. These fixes build confidence
• What's included: Fix labels, Tooltips, Staking logic clarity, Sorting, Etherscan links, Bug fixes, Pie charts

Benefits#

Multi-Wallet Feature Benefits:

• Complete treasury visibility across $1.2M+ treasury on Ethereum and Arbitrum
• Eliminates 10-15 hours/month of manual cross-chain reconciliation
• Real-time insights for enhanced decision making
• Reduces operational overhead through automated reconciliation processes

Rewards System Benefits:

• Streamlines management of 1,250+ contributor records
• Reduces error risk in quarterly reward distributions
• Self-service contributor dashboards with historical tracking
• 15-20 hours/month time savings in manual administration

Combined Platform Impact:

• Eliminates manual process errors in critical financial operations
• Reduces time spent on cross-chain reconciliation and rewards administration (estimated 25-35 hours/month saved)*
• Scalable platform that grows with DAO expansion
• Foundation for continued strategic partnership at competitive MoonDAO pricing
• Revenue growth potential through TreasureCorp user conversion to MoonDAO citizenship

*Assumption based on 10-15 hours/month cross-chain reconciliation + 15-20 hours/month rewards administration. Time savings value varies by organization's operational costs.

Risks#

Technical Integration Risk: Complex multi-chain data integration may face unexpected challenges Mitigation: Experienced team with proven expertise; phased delivery for iterative problem-solving

Data Source Reliability Risk: Tableland or other sources may have inconsistent data formatsMitigation: Comprehensive discovery phase includes data validation and cleanup procedures

Scope Creep Risk: Additional feature requests during development could impact timeline Mitigation: Clearly defined deliverables with change request process; weekly progress reviews

Post-Development Support Risk: Ongoing maintenance and support expectations unclear Mitigation: Separate annual recurring contract with defined SLAs and 30-day opt-out period

Objectives#

Objective #1: Deliver complete Multi-Wallet & Cross-Chain Aggregation system for unified treasury visibility.

Key Results for Objective #1:

• Define and implement wallet categorization system (Executive, Project, Reserve) across Ethereum and Arbitrum
• Create cross-chain aggregation engine supporting Safe API v2 for unified token balance tracking
• Deploy wallet tagging, filtering, and visualization interface with total balance + percentage breakdown
• Enable comprehensive inflow/outflow tracking per wallet and aggregate treasury view

Objective #2: Implement Contributor Rewards System with Tableland integration for transparency and fairness.

Key Results for Objective #2:

• Successfully discover, document, and integrate Tableland reward tables with backend query adapter
• Deploy rewards dashboard tab with contributor/project/cycle filtering and earnings visualization
• Build Sankey diagram or heatmap view showing contributor → project → reward flow patterns
• Parse and normalize reward data from Tableland with support for future IPFS and Google Sheets integration
• Implement MoonDAO citizen recruitment integration within dashboard interface to drive community growth

Member(s) responsible for OKRs and their roles:

• Project Lead (Sarah): Overall delivery coordination, stakeholder communication, timeline management, dependency resolution
• Technical Lead (Huda): Multi-chain integration architecture, Tableland API development, backend aggregation logic
• UI/UX Lead (Wais): Dashboard interface development, visualization components, filtering systems, responsive design

Team (Table A)#

Timeline (Table B)#

Deadline for the project: End of Q3 2025.

Budget (Table C)#

Detailed Cost Breakdown (MoonDAO Competitive Pricing)#

Rates significantly reduced for MoonDAO partnership based on historical DAO payments analysis and multi-quarter feature distribution strategy

MoonDAO Competitive Pricing Analysis#

Transactions (Table D)#

Payment only expected after all milestones achieved by quarter end. ETH amounts calculated at $3,000/ETH - actual amounts will be calculated at time of payment based on milestone completion

ANNEX: Detailed Analysis & Supporting Information#

A1. Detailed Feature Specifications & Phase Breakdown#

Multi-Wallet & Cross-Chain Aggregation - Detailed Phases#

PHASE 1: Scope & User Roles

• Question: How do we group and display different types of wallets in a way that reflects DAO structure?
• Context: MoonDAO manages multiple wallets across purposes (e.g., project vs. exec). Contributors need a clear, role-based view to understand where funds live and how they're grouped.
• Stories:
  • Define wallet types (e.g., Executive, Project, Reserve)
  • Map MoonDAO Safe wallets on Ethereum and Arbitrum
  • Design UX for viewing wallet breakdowns by type
• Effort: Small to Medium complexity

PHASE 2: Cross-Chain Aggregation Engine

• Question: How can we unify wallet data from different chains into a single dashboard?
• Context: DAO treasuries span multiple chains (e.g., Ethereum, Arbitrum). Bringing balances, inflows/outflows, and token data into one view improves financial clarity and decision-making.
• Stories:
  • Support querying both Ethereum and Arbitrum Safes (Safe API v2 supports both)
  • Create aggregation logic to unify token balances (handle duplicates, sorting, unknown tokens)
  • Enable inflow/outflow tracking per wallet + total (transaction fetching and normalization)
  • Add total balance + % breakdown across all wallets (displayed at top-level Treasury dashboard)
• Effort: Medium to Large complexity

PHASE 3: Categorization & Filtering

• Question: How do we help users drill down into specific views and insights across wallets?
• Context: Advanced users need to filter and categorize wallet data (e.g., by token, wallet, project). This enables deeper analysis of trends and budget flows across initiatives.
• Stories:
  • Add wallet tagging and category system (e.g., Executive vs Project) - could be config file or admin UI
  • Support filters by token, wallet, or category - enhance readability and insights
• Effort: Small to Medium complexity

PHASE 4: Visualisation & Usability Layer

• Question: How do we present all this in a way that feels intuitive and visually clear?
• Context: With cross-chain logic in place, the front-end must tie it together—making token flows, wallet types, and breakdowns feel easy to understand without technical knowledge.
• Stories: Implement UI as per design and test end to end with cross chain aggregation engine APIs
• Effort: Large complexity

Contributor Rewards System - Detailed Phases#

PHASE 1: Define Scope & UX Design

• Question: How do we present contributor rewards in a meaningful, user-friendly way?
• Context: DAO members want to verify who was paid, how much, and for which project. Needs to be easy to understand.
• Stories:
  • Define contributor rewards dashboard scope (capture user goals and layout needs from feedback sessions)
  • UX design for rewards dashboard tab (layout for tables, filters, Sankey, summary bar)
  • Implement tab and component structure (routing, tab shell, UI component placeholders)
• Effort: Small to Medium complexity

PHASE 2: Connect to Data (Tableland + Sources)

• Question: Where is this data coming from and how do we get it?
• Context: Tableland is the main source, but some rewards exist in spreadsheets or IPFS blobs.
• Stories:
  • Discover and document reward tables on Tableland (explore Tableland Studio and record schemas)
  • Build backend Tableland query adapter (pagination, retries, SQL interface)
  • Parse Tableland reward rows into usable model (map rows to contributor/project/cycle structure)
  • Display earnings by contributor/project/quarter (primary view with group-by logic)
  • Add contributor/project filters (basic filter dropdowns)
  • Support filtering by cycle (e.g. Q1 2025) - add cycle param to queries and views
  • Add glossary/tooltips for 'earned' vs 'paid' (UI only)
• Effort: Medium to High complexity

PHASE 3: Visualisation & Usability Layer

• Question: How do we make this readable and useful?
• Context: Users want high-level trends and visual insights into fairness and reward spread.
• Stories:
  • Visualise rewarded vs received amounts (compare 'promised' reward with actual payouts)
  • Build Sankey diagram or heatmap view (contributor → project → reward flow)
  • Add summary widgets (top earners, total distributed) - dashboard KPIs
• Effort: Medium to Large complexity

PHASE 4: Extended Sources & Data Cleansing (Future phases post-Q3 2025)

• Question: How do we ensure coverage and accuracy over time?
• Context: Some rewards exist outside Tableland; contributors may appear under different names across cycles.
• Stories:
  • Ingest reward data from IPFS if present (IPFS fetch + JSON parse and ingest)
  • Import and clean historical Google Sheets (one-time import; clean & map columns)
  • Normalize contributor/project names across all sources (alias resolution, fuzzy matching)
  • (Optional) Add contributor profile page (view all contributions + rewards per address)
• Effort: Medium to Large complexity

Future Quarters Feature Roadmap#

Q4 2025: Governance Dashboard Enhancements

• Phase 1: Define scope for governance dashboard tab (align to user personas: proposer, voter, delegate)
• Phase 2: Proposal & voter distribution data (proposer distribution, turnout %, voting power tracking, Sankey diagrams)
• Phase 3: Lifecycle clarity & label fixes (redefine proposal status logic, fix UI labels, filter legacy proposals)
• Phase 4: UX enhancements & scalability (filters by author/status/timeframe, proposal grouping, proposer profiles)

Q1 2026: Reporting Dashboard Improvements

• Phase 1: Budget-aligned structure & views (annual budgeting cycle, time period dropdowns, category/project grouping)
• Phase 2: Exportability & professional reporting (CSV/Google Sheets export, summary stats, date range downloads)
• Phase 3: Visualization & patterns (token movement visualization, historical totals vs proposals, fairness indices)

Q2 2026: UI/UX Fixes & Clarifications

• Phase 1: Global redesign (standardize layout, unify visual style, mobile responsiveness, loading indicators)
• Phase 2: Navigation & interactions (fix broken dropdowns, add hover/click feedback, clarify unclear actions)
• Phase 3: DAO funders & external view (branded visual polish, read-only/public view toggle, print/PDF styling)

Treasury Enhancement Backlog (Integrated across quarters)#

• Critical Issues: Staked ETH display, runway tracker fixes, MOONEY token bug resolution
• Labeling & Classification: Wallet origin labeling, inflow/outflow categorization, transaction tagging
• Visual Improvements: USD/token toggles, pie chart math fixes, improved color palette and charts
• User Experience: Etherscan links, liquid/vesting/staking clarity, "Treasury Health" renaming

MoonDAO Budget Cycle Integration Timeline#

6-Month Planning Support:

• Q3 2025 Foundation: Multi-wallet + rewards system (this proposal) provides baseline analytics for current 6-month budget cycle
• Q4 2025 Integration: Governance analytics to support launchpad decision-making and proposal evaluation processes
• Q1 2026 Scaling: Reporting dashboard for mid-cycle budget review and performance assessment against revenue targets
• Q2 2026 Optimization: UX improvements as organization scales and leadership team expands

Transparency & Accountability Features#

Risk Mitigation:

• Multisig Support: Enhanced transaction tracking for budget oversight and treasury management
• Quarterly Reporting: Automated transparency reports for community review and governance accountability
• Expense Attribution: Clear linking of development costs to revenue generation and operational efficiency
• Performance Accountability: Real-time metrics showing platform impact on organizational sustainability targets

A2. Budget Justification & Industry Analysis#

DAO Treasury Management Industry Benchmark#

According to comprehensive industry analysis, professional DAO treasury management services are priced at 0.5-2% of Assets Under Management (AUM) annually. This benchmark is established by:

Direct Market Pricing:

• Karpatkey: 1-2% AUM annually for active treasury management (managing $50M+ treasuries)
• Traditional asset management: 0.5-2% AUM (mutual funds, hedge funds, wealth management)
• TreasureCorp approach: One-time $15,000 development investment vs. ongoing annual management fees (equivalent to ~6 months of traditional treasury management costs)

DAO Operational Spending Analysis:

• Uniswap DAO: $74,000 for 8-week treasury research ($481,000 annualized)
• dYdX DAO: $30M foundation budget over 3 years for treasury operations
• LidoDAO: $16-18M annual operating costs for treasury management
• Arbitrum DAO: RFP process for managing $10M+ treasury assets

Development Rate Structure#

Based on standard Silicon Valley and London engineering rates for DAO/blockchain development:

Detailed Cost Breakdown (MoonDAO Competitive Pricing)#

Rates significantly reduced for MoonDAO partnership based on historical DAO payments analysis and multi-quarter feature distribution strategy

A2. Competitive Analysis#

TreasureCorp's Comprehensive 4-Dashboard Solution#

Unique Value Proposition: TreasureCorp is the only platform in the DAO analytics space that provides a complete 4-dashboard integrated solution, delivering 70-80% of MoonDAO's financial analytics needs as validated in our Phase 1 Final Report.

Dashboard 1: Overview/Treasury Dashboard

• Complete financial snapshot with asset allocation across all chains
• Real-time balance tracking and portfolio composition
• Treasury runway projections based on current spending patterns

Dashboard 2: Governance Dashboard

• Comprehensive proposal lifecycle tracking from submission to execution
• Voting participation patterns and turnout analytics
• Senate and voting member engagement analysis

Dashboard 3: Simulation Dashboard

• Treasury stress testing and scenario modeling capabilities
• Proposal impact analysis on treasury health and runway
• Risk assessment tools for financial decision making

Dashboard 4: Reporting Dashboard

• Professional-grade reports designed for different stakeholder audiences
• Executive summaries for Senate and treasury signers
• Community transparency reports for general membership

A3. DAO Governance Analytics Market Analysis & Sources#

Comprehensive Market Research#

ArbitrumDAO Governance Dashboard (CuriaLab)

• Total Cost: $50,000 USD (71,000 ARB)
• Treasury Size: ~$100M+ (estimated)
• Cost Proportion: ~0.05% of treasury
• Service Type: Maintenance of existing system
• Source: ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard RFC

SafeDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard (Curia)

• Total Cost: $50,000 for 6-month maintenance and reports
• Team Size: 4-person team
• Service Type: Governance analytics maintenance
• Source: SafeDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard Services

CowDAO Governance Analytics Services

• Service Type: Governance analytics and reporting
• Focus: DAO governance insights and transparency
• Source: CowDAO Governance Analytics Services Grant

Optimism Governance Analytics Dashboard

• Total Cost: 24,500 OP tokens (~$30,000)
• Team Size: 8-person team
• Service Type: Governance metrics and analytics
• Source: OP Governance Analytics Dashboard

MoonDAO Advanced Analytics (TreasureCorp)#

• Total Cost: $15,000 USD (5.0 ETH)
• Treasury Size: $974K
• Cost Proportion: 1.54% of treasury
• Service Type: Complete platform development with MoonDAO partnership pricing
• Unique Value: Integrated treasury + governance + rewards (vs. governance-only solutions)

Market Position Analysis#

Based on the documented DAO governance analytics proposals above, TreasureCorp's pricing falls within established market ranges while providing superior integrated capabilities:

1. Development vs Maintenance: Building integrated platform from scratch vs maintaining existing dashboard
2. Scope Complexity: Treasury + governance + rewards integration vs single governance analytics
3. Treasury Scale Economics: Smaller treasuries require proportionally higher allocation for comprehensive solutions
4. Technology Integration: Multi-source integration (3 platforms) with real-time synchronization
5. Competitive Pricing: Significantly below market rates for comprehensive development projects

A4. Success Metrics & Evaluation Framework#

Technical Success Metrics#

• Multi-Chain Integration: 99.5% uptime excluding external API outages (Safe API, Tableland)
• Data Accuracy: <1% variance in cross-chain balance calculations vs. on-chain data
• Performance: <5 second load times for standard dashboard views (excluding initial data sync)

Operational Impact Metrics#

• Time Savings: 90%+ reduction in manual cross-chain reconciliation time
• Process Efficiency: 75%+ reduction in manual rewards administration time
• Error Reduction: Zero calculation errors in quarterly reward distributions

Business Impact Metrics#

• Cost Savings: Minimum $1,400/month operational cost reduction
• Cost Recovery: 100%+ cost recovery within 11 months (accelerated due to competitive pricing)
• Platform Adoption: Integration into MoonDAO's regular governance workflows

A5. Post-Development Support Options#

Ongoing Support and Maintenance#

• Monthly Service Fee: $300/month
• Annual Contract Option: $3,240/year (10% discount - save $360 annually)
• 30-Day Opt-Out Period: Full refund if cancelled within first 30 days

Services Include:

• Platform maintenance and bug fixes
• Infrastructure hosting and monitoring
• Data source maintenance and API updates
• Monthly feature enhancements based on community feedback
• Priority support with 24-hour response SLA

4-Week Intensive Development Structure#

Milestone-Based Payment Schedule:

• 5 milestone payments over 4 weeks (August 28 - September 25)
• Weekly deliverable reviews with accelerated coordination
• Dedicated team focus for rapid delivery
• Total cost: $15,000 (5.0 ETH) - MoonDAO partnership pricing

A6. Risk Assessment & Mitigation Strategies#

Technical Risks#

• Multi-chain API rate limiting: Implement caching layers and fallback data sources
• Tableland schema changes: Build flexible data adapters with version compatibility

Project Risks#

• Scope expansion requests: Formal change request process with impact assessment
• Key team member unavailability: Cross-training and documented development processes

Business Risks#

• Maintenance cost increases: Transparent cost structure in recurring service agreement
• DAO structure changes: Flexible architecture designed for configuration changes