Author: (https://www.celestialcommons.org/team) Daniel Mackisack, Philip Linden, Molly MacEachen, Ruvimbo Samanga, Ayumi Tsuyuki, Sam Jardine Date: 2025-10-15

Abstract#

Celestial Commons is a community-driven initiative focused on engaging new audiences and bringing new communities into the space sector through participatory policy making. The goal is to overcome public feelings of alienation from and apathy towards the benefits of space, by engaging citizens globally in the policy process, ensuring that everyone has a voice and a stake in the future of humanity beyond Earth.

Celestial Commons on the Space Acceleration Network Project website: The Citizens' Space Policy Initiative Project Plan: https://www.celestialcommons.org/our-plan Project trial results: Top 3 priorities of early respondents Daniel's Town Hall presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjQyMdVXKl0 Ideation post: https://discord.com/channels/914720248140279868/1395516209428041748 Previous Proposal: https://www.moondao.com/proposal/189

This proposal launches this project and provides foundational continuity for a full year, by funding a license to the software platform used to facilitate large scale collaborative policy creation, by collecting, synthesizing and analyzing responses.

With an active license, we can confidently demo the initiative to other partners with large reach and other partnership opportunities; launch the first major round of participation; generate our first policy platform; and begin our advocacy work, bringing more people and organisations into the sector.

MoonDAO will be among the first core sponsors that make this project a reality, and will benefit in terms of both exposure and growth, beyond its established reach.

Problem#

“What about all the problems here on Earth?”

It’s a narrative we’ve all heard before. One that comes from a place of real and understandable concern. There is no shortage of challenges, and a great many of them hit close to home. But it’s also a false choice. One that we need to overcome, if we want to ensure sustainable development of the sector, while addressing those challenges and building a shared future.

Space has never been more accessible. Yet for so many, it can feel out of reach, alienating and even irrelevant. It still has the air of science fiction – real only for the exceptionally trained or exceedingly wealthy – and that perception is exacerbated by the current climate. Combined with political polarisation and pervasive cynicism, these perceptions fuel a negative feedback loop that further disengages the general public, threatening scientific research, peaceful exploration, economic development, sustainable growth and long-term public benefit.

In other words, public concerns about the future risk becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Although space-based systems, activity and infrastructure already impact our lives in innumerable ways, just telling people isn’t enough. “Space is for everyone” is only a platitude unless we make it so. The public needs a way to directly and authentically engage with building our future in space, free of preconceptions and prerequisites. The best way to do that is to embrace the obstacle as an opportunity – working backwards from aspirations for the future to priorities for the present; identifying points of consensus; building a new kind of connection with the sector; and replacing that negative loop with a positive one.

Solution#

Drawing on participatory methodologies, we’re undertaking a collaborative goal-setting and policy creation process. It starts with two open questions:

• What do you want humanity’s future in space to look like?
• What should governments, businesses, and others be doing now to make that future a reality?

Using AI-driven civic tech and leveraging reach through global partnerships, we gather and synthesise large volumes of public responses (from text to video, online and in person), transforming them into both a shared vision, and a dynamic Citizens’ Policy Platform that becomes a foundational resource for civil society groups, political parties, and other organisations where agendas are still forming and who are seeking inclusive, foresighted policies in emerging frontiers.

In our early trials, participants across Europe and the United States found consensus on core issues and aspirations, from “Equity & Inclusion” to “International Cooperation” and “Environmental Protection”.

We are now targeting thousands of participants in dozens of countries and channelling their voices straight into the grassroots of policymaking, while offering those in both the public and private sectors authentic insights on shifting public sentiments, aspirations and priorities.

Our goal is simple – to make space not just something people care about, but something they feel part of. Because if recent history has taught us anything, it’s that sustainable progress depends on a public that is not only informed and inspired, but actively included.

At the heart of this project, is the requirement for a software platform that facilitates not only large-scale public participatory, deliberative and creative processes as well as traditional surveys, but provides us with the ability to synthesise inputs at scale; analyse the data; and transform the results into workable documents.

The project lead, Daniel, as a consultant and product developer/manager in the political innovation space, has conducted extensive research and had experience working with more than a dozen tools currently on the market and used by government at all levels to facilitate everything from citizens assemblies and policy labs through to participatory budgets and the design of physical community spaces.

The specific methodology of the project draws together best practice elements from across the spectrum of participatory and deliberative democracy initiatives and applies them within the unique framework of space policy and the space sector, with the specific objectives provided above. This creates certain niche requirements which have also been fleshed out further through engagement with independent advisory and support bodies in the citizen participation domain (such as People Powered via their menteeship program)

Our decision-making is further informed by independent comparative analysis. A list of tools and independent ratings, including relative pricing, can be found here - https://www.peoplepowered.org/platform-ratings

*Specific price points for many of these tools are not available to the public, can only be acquired through consultation, and may not be shared. However, annual subscriptions range from free (simplistic voting tools), to 5000 USD (basic participatory budgeting and concept voting tools), to more than 30,000 USD for those tools targeted at the state level for large-scale public engagement with GIS analysis and campaigning features.

Based on all of the above, we have chosen GoVocal under a Premium License as the software platform capable of executing our methodology. Our project budget solely reflects a 12-month license for the software with a feature set for our specific purpose, and factors for a 30% discount for purchase within a specific time window, as well as a small margin accounting for shifts in conversion rates.

In terms of price point, GoVocal sits in the middle of the pack. Most of the other tools on the market, however, regardless of price point, are unsuitable for the specific methodology of the project. That being, the AI-driven synthesis of large-scale survey responses and the AI-driven querying of the resulting database. GoVocal is one of the highest rated many years running (87/100 in 2025) and stands alone in its functionality, as it allows us to easily generate summaries as well policy proposals and other documents out of a large volume of complex responses with minimum overhead; view inline referencing to the specific source input of summary statements; query the database in real language; and generate custom documents by specifying demographic and other variables.

For example, we can ask “What are the top 3 policy priorities of those respondents living in Germany?” and the platform will provide us with an answer. We can then say “Please format this as a policy document” and it will do so. We can further ask the platform to “Contrast aspirations for humanity's future in space between those in the United States and Australia” and it will do so. Or, drawing on different data attained over time, we can ask “How have perspectives and priorities in the UK shifted over the last year” and will similarly get a real language response. In this way, the platform acts as a standalone LLM with a consensually provided dataset of human perspectives on space, in addition to a participatory policymaking tool.

The GoVocal team has also been very helpful with getting our prototype set up on a trial license. We successfully deployed the prototype survey and derived policy insights from the responses (with references) with their purpose-built AI tools. The survey form is robust and supports text, audio, or video responses and localisation to multiple languages. The AI tools not only summarise responses but also extract themes from aggregated responses, with links back to responses that are cited, even for languages other than English. We are confident that this tool allows us to effectively process many, many responses with the confidence that we are preserving the views of participants, and enables us to discover themes or policy objectives from the entire population (or subsets of the population that we choose).

As mentioned, however, we need a full license to deploy the survey and analyse it at scale (hundreds, thousands of responses at least) early next year. So far, we have been relying on our personal time, funds, and networks to prove the concept.

Further to the methodological component of this project and the software requirements, Daniel has brought the idea to a number of potential partner organisations and individuals, including space exploration special interest societies, political parties in Europe and the South Pacific, and non-profits globally. All of whom have expressed a strong interest in participation and are receptive to treating the resulting documents as references for their own policy work. We can boost confidence in our project, accelerate official partnerships and procure additional funding if we can show that we have backing from MoonDAO and a long-term license to the GoVocal platform.

Benefits#

MoonDAO is "the internet's space program" -- What better way to show that in action than to derive real space policy from the voices of all humans? This project is emblematic of MoonDAO's values and sponsoring this project is a statement that the DAO is serious about making change and building the foundation for accessible global participation in the space sector.

The primary benefits to MoonDAO would be:

• Growth of the DAO community
• Growth of the Space Acceleration Network
• Growth of the DAO’s Citizen membership
• Growth in recurring revenue from the above
• Growth in audience and market for future revenue-generating initiatives
• Public association with grassroots citizen-driven policy

Further to the above, there is also an opportunity for MoonDAO citizens to directly accelerate the reach of this initiative in the future. I think the collective of MoonDAO citizens, in the Space Acceleration Network and otherwise, is the ideal "kernel" to seed this sampling. The MoonDAO Space Acceleration Network (SAN) is global distribution of people from many backgrounds, and especially people motivated to talk about space with their friends and family. However, to get there we need to lay the foundation! (The SAN integration would be a future proposal)

Furthermore, there are plans to create sustainable revenue streams with the project in the future, through the production and leasing of immersive engagement booths to museums, observatories and other ‘space experiences’. However this is not the immediate priority of this phase of the project.

Risks#

There is a risk that an unforeseen event or issue delays our survey deployment strategy. This would effectively "waste" the value of the license, which is valid for a fixed 1-year period. We must capitalise on the platform within the 2026 calendar year to make this worthwhile.

In order for the GoVocal platform to be worthwhile, we must deploy our survey to large audiences within 1 year. This is a risk that hinges on the team's ability to get the word out and obtain access to venues or mailing lists. We are confident that this is achievable, thanks to our team's initial marketing & rollout plans including a social media campaign.

There is also a risk that potential partners are less receptive than has been indicated. However this is unlikely, as there has been significant overtures, from industry, politics and civil society about the need for public input and recent political and budgetary shifts have amplified these calls.

Finally, there is a risk that the project would not secure sustainable funding within the 2026 calendar year in order to continue and iterate in the following years. However, that would not undermine the benefit of the project itself, nor the resources it creates, nor the potential benefits for MoonDAO itemised above.

Objectives#

Q4 2025

Objective - Finalize Design of Citizens’ Policy Initiative

OKR1 - Survey and methodology is submitted to a peer organisation for review. OKR2 - Survey and methodology is approved by a citizen participation expert.

Objective - Expand Reach of Citizens’ Space Policy Initiative

OKR3 - Secure 5 partner organisations capable of assisting with global reach. OKR4 - Secure reach of 5000+ for initial survey delivery.

Objective - Establish a Publicly Accessible Platform OKR5 - Purchase 1 year subscription to GoVocal platform OKR6 - Onboard team and finalise public portal

Q1 - 4 2026

Objective - Launch Citizens’ Space Policy Initiative

OKR7 - Deliver survey to existing networks.

Objective - Grow MoonDAO Space Acceleration Network

OKR8 - Project activities result in 3 additional teams within the 2026 calendar year OKR9 - Project activities result in 20 additional citizens within the calendar year

Objective - Promote MoonDAO as Core Partner

OKR10 - MoonDAO logo and link to MoonDAO is present on survey and included in participant network engagement OKR11 - MoonDAO support for the project is mentioned on social media no less than 10 times during the calendar year

Objective - Deliver Results

OKR12 - Deliver first iteration of Citizens Space Vision to advocacy partners OKR13 - Deliver first iteration of Citizens Space Policy to advocacy partners

Team (Table A)#

Timeline (Table B)#

Deadline for the project: End of Q4 2026.

Transactions (Table C)#

--- nance-actions
- type: Request Budget
  payload:
    budget:
      - token: ETH
        amount: "4"
        justification: GoVocal Premium Annual Subscription
  uuid: 2e9875ddb9954db7b178b884d65eaad9
  chainId: 1